Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Articles

Section default policy

Book Reviews

The EU has faced unprecedented challenges to live up to its mission to create a peaceful future based on common values. Despite the incorporation of foundational values into instruments of global governance, societal actors have increasingly opposed both the methods by which the EU propagates its values and the values themselves. Failure to apply a values based foreign policy consistently, to uphold human rights and to promote democracy in and outside the EU leads to charges of hypocrisy. Such dissonance between values-based policy and Realpolitik fosters criticism of-- if not skepticism toward--the European project. These contestations come from actors in and outside the EU. Understanding contestations is of utmost importance for the EU, not only for the resilience of the Union but also for its future role on the international scene.

Thus, the Interdisciplinary Review of ValEUs invites book reviews on works that address EU values and their history in the European project; that consider their application in domestic policy; that attend to their role in foreign policy; examine the instruments of application like accession agreements, privileged partnerships, development aid, military threat, etc.; discuss political and civil society contestations; offer analyses of Euroscepticism; or that consider the role of academic and public intellectuals in the promotion and contestation of EU values.

Length. 500-750 words for individual book reviews.

Before submitting a book review, consult with the editorial team of the Interdisciplinary Review of ValEUs. We will not accept book reviews by authors themselves or by people connected through material interest to the book.

For inquiries please contact:

Randall Halle, Director European Studies Center/Jean Monnet EU Center of Excellence, University of Pittsburgh rhalle@pitt.edu

Review Essays

The EU has faced unprecedented challenges to live up to its mission to create a peaceful future based on common values. Despite the incorporation of foundational values into instruments of global governance, societal actors have increasingly opposed both the methods by which the EU propagates its values and the values themselves. Failure to apply a values based foreign policy consistently, to uphold human rights and to promote democracy in and outside the EU leads to charges of hypocrisy. Such dissonance between values-based policy and Realpolitik fosters criticism of-- if not skepticism toward--the European project. These contestations come from actors in and outside the EU. Understanding contestations is of utmost importance for the EU, not only for the resilience of the Union but also for its future role on the international scene.

Thus, the Interdisciplinary Review of ValEUs invites review essays considering 3 books or more on works that address EU values and their history in the European project; that consider their application in domestic policy; that attend to their role in foreign policy; examine the instruments of application like accession agreements, privileged partnerships, development aid, military threat, etc.; discuss political and civil society contestations; offer analyses of Euroscepticism; or that consider the role of academic and public intellectuals in the promotion and contestation of EU values.

Length 1000-2500 for review essays.

Before submitting a book review, consult with the editorial team of the Interdisciplinary Review of ValEUs. We will not accept book reviews by authors themselves or by people connected through material interest to the book.

For inquiries please contact:

Randall Halle, Director European Studies Center/Jean Monnet EU Center of Excellence, University of Pittsburgh rhalle@pitt.edu

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.